|

April 2014 Vol. 3 Issue
4
Other viewing option
Abstract
•
Full
text
•Reprint
(PDF) (153 KB)
Search Pubmed for articles by:
Yakasai IA
Abubakar MY
Other links:
PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed
|
|
Global Advanced Research Journal
of Medicine and Medical Sciences (GARJMMS) ISSN: 2315-5159
April 2014 Vol. 3(4), pp.
080-083
Copyright © 2014 Global Advanced
Research Journals
Full Length Research Paper
|
Trends in elective
caesarean section rate in Aminu Kano Teaching
Hospital, Kano: a four (4) year review
Ibrahim Adamu Yakasai1*
and Muhammed Yusuf Abubakar2
1Senior
Lecturer/Consultant, Bayero University Kano/
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aminu Kano
Teaching Hospital Kano, Nigeria.
2Senior
Registrar, Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital Kano,
Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author E- mail:
ibrahimyakasai57@hotmail.com
Accepted 07 April, 2014
|
|
Abstract |
|
Caesarean section (CS) is increasingly used for safe
delivery for fetal or maternal indications either as
an elective or emergency. The procedure is
increasingly been used for delivery even in the
developing countries due to the relative safety of
blood transfusion services, improved anaesthesia,
aseptic techniques and the availability of potent
antibiotics.
Elective caesarean sections have been pronounced
safer for both the mother and the fetus in terms of
adverse events compared to emergency caesarean
sections. Paradoxically, emergency caesarean
sections continue to form the bulk of caesarean
deliveries in our facility. Although the study has
shown a steady increase in elective CS rate,
probably due to increased cohort of patients with 2
or more caesarean sections, increased utilization of
CS for breech presentations in primigravidae at term
and for women with bad obstetric history. The aim of
this study was to determine the trends in caesarean
section rates. This was a retrospective study of the
clinical records of all patients that had Caesarean
Section in Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano from
January 2006 to December 2009, a 4 year period. Data
on the number and type of Caesarean Section, age of
patients and the indication for the Caesarean
Section were extracted and analyzed. There were
total of 14,570 deliveries at the facility over the
period of the study, out of which 2,519 were
caesarean sections giving a caesarean section rate
of 17.3%. Of all the patients that had caesarean
sections, 2,131 (84.6%) were emergency caesarean
section, while 388 (15.4%) were elective caesarean
sections. There was a steady increase in elective
caesarean section rate from 12.4% in 2006 to 18.5%
and 17.1% in the last two years of the study period
respectively. Repeat caesarean sections following
two or more previous caesarean sections were the
commonest indication for the elective caesarean
section accounting for 51.3% of all cases, followed
by bad obstetric history and abnormal presentations/
lie accounting for 11.5% and 10.3% of cases
respectively. The caesarean section rate in our
centre was 17.1% and there is a rising trend of
elective caesarean section in our centre accounting
for 1 out of every 6 caesarean sections. The
commonest indication for elective caesarean section
was two or more previous caesarean sections.
Keywords:
Elective, emergency, caesarean section, outcome.
|
| |
|