|
Contact Us||
About Us
Advancing the World with Knowledge... |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

March 2012 Vol. 1(2)
• Abstract
•
Full text
•Reprint
(PDF) (114 KB)
Search Pubmed for
articles by:
Oyedijo A
Other links:
PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed
|
|
GLOBAL ADVANCED RESEARCH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS STUDIES
March 2012 Vol. 1(2), pp
061-069
Copyright © 2012 Global Advanced Research Journals
Full Length Research Paper
|
Effects of product –
market diversification strategy on corporate
financial performance and growth: an empirical study
of some companies in Nigeria
Ade Oyedijo
Department of Business Administration and Management
Technology, Lagos State University, Ojo, Lagos,
Nigeria.
Email:
Oyedijo98@yahoo.com
Accepted 05 March, 2012; Received 16 February 2012
|
|
Abstract |
|
This study takes diversification research to a new
level of analysis by examining the performance of a
sample of Nigerian companies in relation to
specialization, related, unrelated and mixed
product-market diversification strategies. It was
proposed that firms that pursue related
diversification strategy outperform and grow faster
than those that attempt to pursue
unrelated diversification
strategy.
It was further proposed that firms that pursue
related diversification strategy exclusively will
perform better than firms that pursue a mixed (i.e.
related and unrelated) diversification strategy.
Using the
Panel Regression
analytical technique involving correlation,
F-statistics and descriptive
statistics, the result of the Fixed Effect test
showed
that there is a high and positive correlation
between financial performance
and growth of firms
and
related
diversification strategy. Related diversifiers had a
relatively higher level of financial performance
and growth
than unrelated and mixed diversifiers. A marginal
correlation was found between unrelated and mixed
modes of diversification and financial performance
and growth. The
panel
regression analysis showed that related
diversification has a significant impact on
performance (p< 0.05) while unrelated
diversification has a negative but non-significant
impact on performance and growth. The result of the
F-statistics
showed that there were significant performance
and growth
differences between firms utilizing related
diversification strategies and those utilizing
unrelated diversification strategies (F =
147.4405,
p <0.05). The
panel model result
further confirmed that there is a significant
difference between the performanceand
growth
of firms using mixed (related and unrelated)
diversification
strategies and the performance
and growth
of firms pursuing
related
diversification strategy
exclusively.
A significant difference was also found between the
performance
and growth
of firms that develop through unrelated
diversification and the performance
and growth
of firms that remained specialized, with firms that
remained specialized performing better on all
parameters and growing
faster
than those that develop through unrelated
diversification only. The study concludes that the
financial performance and growth of firms in Nigeria
are significantly affected by the mode of
diversification used and recommends that Nigerian
firms that are seeking a sustainable fast growth and
superior performance should pursue
either
a related product-market diversification strategy or
a specialization strategy.
Keywords:
Diversification, Strategy, Performance,
Product-Market
|
| |
|
|
|