|

Vol. 3(1), January 2014
Other viewing option
Abstract
•
Full text
•Reprint
(PDF) (210 KB)
seid'ou k
Other links:
PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed
|
|
Global Advanced Research Journal
of History, Political Science and International Relations (GARJHPSIR)
ISSN: 2315-506X
January 2014 Vol.
3(1), pp 008-016
Copyright © 2014 Global Advanced
Research Journals
Full Length
Research Paper
|
Gold Coast Hand and Eye Work: A
genealogical History
seid’ou, kąrî’kạchä
Department of Painting and Sculpture, Kwame Nkrumah
University of Science and Technology, Kumasi.
E-mail:
karikacza@gmail.com; Mobile: +233200213128
Accepted January 15, 2014
|
|
Abstract |
|
This paper investigates the intellectual legacy of
Hand and Eye Work, the first art-based curriculum
officially introduced by the Gold Coast colonial
government, appearing first in the Educational Code
of 1887. Adapting the genealogical method of
Foucault for a historical study, I unearth the Hand
and Eye programme's kinship with child-centered
education schemes of Pestalozzi and his follower
Froebel, and their lineage of technical and
vocational education schemes in the British South
Kensington “manual training” system, the German
Gewerbeschule and the Scandinavian
Slöjd
system. I argue that the “bread and butter”
vocational focus of the colonial scheme displaced
the more recondite and progressive aspects of the
Pestalozzi-Froebelian system. The programme became
mechanistic and remained impervious to modern art
until G. A. Stevens, a young graduate from the Slade
School, became art master in the Government Training
College and Achimota College. Echoing his mentor
Roger Fry's dictum to “get rid of all that
South-Kensington nonsense”, Stevens critiqued Hand
and Eye training thus: “There was, and is, no
provision for the training of taste, appreciation,
criticism, or for the slightest perception of art
history”. This was the beginning of a revolution in
Gold Coast art education.
Keywords:
Gold Coast, Hand and Eye Work
|
|
|
|